Our discussion forums are available to anyone to read, but you must be a member to reply or start new topics. Log-in or register to get started.

Victoria Villanueva

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Quiz 2 Question 42 #490916
    Victoria Villanueva
    Participant

    Ohhhhhhh…got it!!

    in reply to: Statistics – True positives #490729
    Victoria Villanueva
    Participant

    Hey!

    Yes this helps a lot. I took the time to revisit the charts regarding the math related to sensitivity and specificity which also was helpful to visualize. I realize that high sensitivity tests cast a wide net, and will capture every true positive. However Sensitive tests will not be able to tell you anything regarding the false positives. Therefore a sensitive test is a good way to ensure every patient who is a faller will be identified as a high fall risk. Then, if a negative result comes up on a very sensitive test, you can be confident that it is a true negative since false negative rate is very low in a highly sensitive test. Then SNout makes sense to me.

    That makes sense right?? I’m trying to think about sensitivity and specificity in a way that I can recall at any time or apply to any situation.

    Thanks again!

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)